Each pic is from a Superbowl XLII commercial. The first one uses a racist caricature of Asians. The second one makes use of sexually suggestive language. Can you tell me what the difference between these commercials is?
The difference is Fox was fine with airing the racist commercial but decided the Danica Patrick commercial was inappropriate for viewers.
Anyone see something wrong with this? Apparently the company (who I shall not even bother naming) intended to make the worst Superbowl commercial for the publicity. Great. Well, I'm going to hold Fox responsible for this one.